linear_cross_entropy_loss

KO | EN

gitlite — search

#javascript #python #hacktoberfest #react #ai #typescript #llm #go #golang #android #machine-learning #rust #deep-learning #linux

linear_cross_entropy_loss

(★ 75)

A fusion of a linear layer and a cross entropy loss, written for pytorch in triton.

linear_cross_entropy_loss 최신버젼 다운로드

최종 버전 다운로드 (.zip)

// repository documentation

Was this content helpful?

★ 0 (0 ratings)

# LinearCrossEntropyLoss

This is a fused implementation that combines `torch.nn.Linear` layer and `torch.nn.CrossEntropLoss` into a single module.
This kind of fused implementation can save a lot of activation memory, especially in usecases in language modeling where sequence lengths or batch sizes are long
and vocabulary sizes are massive. Compared to a baseline implementation, which may materialize 2-3 tensors of size `batch_size x seq_length x vocabulary_size x 4`, this module will only materialize a single tensor of size
```N_chunk_size x vocabulary_size x 4``` bytes at its peak. `N_chunk_size` is a user-controlled variable.

As an additional benefit, the implementation is a bit more careful about floating point operations and, in my tests, noticeably more accurate 
than the baseline, without being slower (see benchmarks shown below and in the `bench` folders).

This solution owes a lot to the implementation of `mgmalek`, which is posted here: https://github.com/mgmalek/efficient_cross_entropy.
You can think of this implementation as a more feature-complete version of the same chunking strategy, with gains through additional fusions
of everything else into matrix multiplication prologues/epilogues, and some changes to preserve accuracy. The whole thing was written after reading 
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/124480, which contains a lot of interesting input from `YouJiacheng` and from the PyTorch team. 
I somewhat assume that this kind of performance optimization will eventually be entirely subsumed by improvements to `torch.compile`.

# Usage 
    >>> from linear_cross_entropy import LinearCrossEntropyLoss
    >>> module = LinearCrossEntropyLoss(2048, 16384).cuda().half()
    >>> x = torch.randn(4, 512, 2048, dtype=torch.float16, device=torch.device("cuda"))
    >>> y = torch.randint(0, 16384, (4, 512), device=torch.device("cuda"), dtype=torch.long)
    >>> loss = module(x, y)

`LinearCrossEntropyLoss` applies a linear transformation to the incoming data `z = xA^T` and then immediately
        computes the cross entropy loss of z with a tensor of labels y, `L(z, y)`, which it returns as a scalar value.

### Caveats:
* All dimensions need to be divisible by sufficiently large powers of 2
* This works only on devices where triton works.
* Monitoring is optional and turned off by default.
* Speed-ups over a compiled torch baseline only materialize in float 16 with sufficiently large vocabulary sizes / numbers of classes
    or very long sequences or batch sizes.
* This module is an instance of `nn.Linear` to pick up initialization calls to `nn.Linear`, but the weight matrix is transposed
    compared to normal `nn.Linear` layers.
* This function will call a (substantial) triton autotune list the first time it is called. You can reduce or change the number of evaluated
    configs by modifying `linear_cross_entropy.fwd_configs` and `linear_cross_entropy.bwd_configs`.
* Be careful when auto-casting this module. Right now, the code default to auto-casting to `float16`. This might not be what you need.
* If you want to use this module for *inference*, you should re-enable checks so that the backward function only triggers if `weight.requires_grad` is `True`. (I didn't do this by default because it is incompatible with `autocast`.)

### Troubleshooting:
If you observe 
```
    raise OutOfResources(self.metadata.shared, max_shared, "shared memory")
triton.runtime.errors.OutOfResources: out of resource: shared memory, Required: 131072, Hardware limit: 101376. Reducing block sizes or `num_stages` may help.
```
then one of the auto-tuned block configurations does not fit onto your card. This is very possible if you use a non-standard GPU. To fix this, enable print-outs of the current configuration (look for the `tl.static_print` statements) and then disable the offending auto-tune configurations (or add new ones that fit your device better).

If you observe issues related to `custom_fwd`, then this is related to the `torch.autocast` decorators. If you don't use autocast, you can safely remove the decorators on the forward and backward pass.

### Monitoring:
Setting `LinearCrossEntropyLoss(2048, 16384).monitoring = True` will additionally accumulate a number of monitoring
variables as a dictionary in  `module.metrics`. These are
* Logit Norm
* Maximal logit value
* Logit Entropy
* z-regularization value.
  
Note: norm and entropy values are a constant away from what you might expect.

### Args:
* `in_features`: hidden size of each input sample
* `out_features`: size of each output sample (this will be vocabulary size / number of classes)
* `ignore_index`: Which label index to ignore (as in normal CrossEntropyLoss) [Default: -1]
* `logit_scale`: Whether to scale the logits before the loss computations [Default: 1.0]
* `z_regularization`: Whether to include z regularization (minimizing logsumexp(x)) [Default: 0.0]
* `N_chunk_size`: How fine to chunk the leading dimensions. The peak memory load will be N_chunk_size x out_features x 4 bytes [Default 4096]
* `init_method`: This is an optional callable initialization function [Default: None]

### Shape:
- Input `x` (input embeddings): :math:`(*, H_{in})` where :math:`*` means any number of
    dimensions including none and :math:`H_{in} = \text{in\_features}`.
- Input `y` (labels): :math:`(*)` This should be a `torch.long` tensor with the same number of elements,`(*)`,
    as the input embeddings.
- Output: :math:`(1,)` This function always returns the fully reduced loss.

### Attributes:
- `weight`: the learnable weights of the module of shape
    :math:`(\text{in\_features}, \text{out\_features})`. The values are
    initialized from :math:`\mathcal{N}_text{trunc}(1/ \sqrt{k})`, where
    :math:`k = \frac{1}{\text{in\_features}}`

### Functional Form

You can also directly use the functional version as `linear_cross_entropy(x,y)`

# Benchmark Results

There are a ton of benchmarks of speed (in `bench`), memory (in `bench-mem`) and accuracy (in `bench-acc`). Take a look!
The benchmarking script is `bench_fusions.py`.

![Speed Benchmark](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JonasGeiping/linear_cross_entropy_loss/main/bench/fp16-fwd-bwd-Linear+Loss-Performance-over-H.-Defaults:-N=B*S=16384,-V=131072.png)

![Memory Benchmark](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JonasGeiping/linear_cross_entropy_loss/main/bench-mem/bf16-fwd-bwd-Linear+Loss-Memory-Peak-over-N.-Defaults:-N=B*S=16384,-H=2048,-V=131072.png)

![Accuracy Benchmark](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JonasGeiping/linear_cross_entropy_loss/main/bench-acc/bwd-fp16-Linear+Loss-Accuracy-over-N.-Defaults:-N=B*S=16384,-H=2048,-V=131072.png)

For reference, the benchmarked version of `torch.compile` is the nightly from the 15th of July, 2024.

# Final Notes

This solution of "z/logit chunks in SRAM" is still quite unsatisfying to me. I would have prefered not to ever materialize the logits in
main memory, but have so far failed to find a scalable solution to that end. You can find a graveyard of bad alternatives in the `variants`
folder. The problem that I've run into is that the hidden dimensions I care about are to large to keep large chunks cached, leading to 
extensive traffic to and from the cache that kills performance.

linear_cross_entropy_loss

linear_cross_entropy_loss 최신버젼 다운로드

오늘의 추천 프로젝트

Was this content helpful?

Recent Feedback

linear_cross_entropy_loss

linear_cross_entropy_loss 최신버젼 다운로드

오늘의 추천 프로젝트

Was this content helpful?

Recent Feedback

Download README