ensLoss

KO | EN

gitlite — search

#javascript #python #hacktoberfest #react #ai #typescript #llm #go #golang #android #machine-learning #rust #deep-learning #linux

(★ 35)

EnsLoss: Stochastic Calibrated Loss Ensembles for Preventing Overfitting in Classification

ensLoss Latest Version Download

Download Latest Version (.zip)

// repository documentation

Was this content helpful?

★ 0 (0 ratings)

# 🔂 *EnsLoss*: Stochastic Calibrated Loss Ensembles for Preventing Overfitting in Classification

[![Python](https://badges.aleen42.com/src/python.svg)](https://www.python.org/)
[![PRs Welcome](https://img.shields.io/badge/PRs-welcome-brightgreen.svg)](https://github.com/statmlben/ensLoss/pulls)

## Introduction

Empirical risk minimization (ERM) with a computationally feasible surrogate loss is a widely accepted approach for binary classification. Specifically, given a training dataset $(\mathbf{x}\_i, y_i)_{i=1}^n$, the $\phi$-classification framework is formulated as:

$$
\min\_{f \in \mathcal{F}} \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \phi ( y_i f(\mathbf{x}\_i) ),
$$

where $\phi$ is a computing loss function to facilitate the empirical computation. Notably, most successful classification methods fall within this ERM framework, utilizing various loss functions and functional spaces.

For example, typical losses including the hinge loss $\phi(z) = (1 - z)_+$ for SVMs, the exponential loss $\phi(z) = \exp(-z)$ for AdaBoost, and the logistic loss $\phi(z) = \log(1 + \exp(-z))$ for logistic regression, see the various loss function in the right figure.

Notably, the surrogate loss is not arbitrary, typically requiring *convexity* and *calibration* (CC) properties to ensure consistency in maximizing accuracy, which is summarized in the following theorem.

> **Theorem 1** (Classification-calibration; Bartlett et al., 2006). A convex loss function $\phi$ is classification-calibrated if and only if it is differentiable at 0 and $\phi'(0) < 0$.

**Motivative Question.** However, in practical applications, determining which loss function performs better is a very challenging problem, as it is typically unknown and can vary across datasets.

We examine two of the most popular losses: BCE and Hinge loss. We provide experimental results on 45 CIFAR2 datasets (see codes in [main_img.py](./main_image.py)), which also confirms that the superiority of the loss function is not consistent across different models / datasets.

| Model | ResNet34 | ResNet50 | VGG16 | VGG19 |
|-------|----------|----------|-------|-------|
| BCE > Hinge | 3 | 26 | 9 | 13 |
| Hinge > BCE | 42 | 19 | 36 | 22 |

## Our Method: EnsLoss

In this project, we propose a novel loss ensemble method, namely **EnsLoss**, which extends the ensemble learning concept to combine losses within the ERM framework. Unlike existing ensemble methods, our method distinctively preserves the "*legitimacy*" of the combined losses, i.e., ensuring the CC properties.

- GitHub repo: [https://github.com/statmlben/ensloss](https://github.com/statmlben/ensloss)
- ICML 2025: [pdf](https://openreview.net/pdf?id=wP8meX6uJC)

This repo describes a set of experiments that demonstrate the performance of the proposed **EnsLoss** method compared with existing methods based on a *fixed loss function*, and also assess its *compatibility* with other regularization methods.

> **Quick overview.** Comparison of epoch-vs-test\_accuracy curves for various models on CIFAR2 (cat-dog) dataset using **EnsLoss** (ours) and other fixed losses (logistic (BCE), hinge, and exponential losses).
>
> ![overview](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/statmlben/ensLoss/main/fig/overview.png)

The proposed **EnsLoss** is optimal (over other loss functions; even over epoch-wise) on almost all 45 CIFAR2 datasets (with all other experimental setups kept identical), see the detailed results in [Benchmarks for Image Data](#benchmarks-for-image-data).

## Motivation

### {ensemble + CC} losses in SGD
The primary motivation behind consists of two components: **ensemble** and the **calibration** (CC conditions) of the loss functions.

![demo](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/statmlben/ensLoss/main/fig/demo.png)

### CC losses | CC loss-derivatives

The key observation of SGD is that the *impact of the loss function $\phi$ on SGD is solely reflected in its loss-derivative $\partial \phi$*. We only need to generate the valid loss derivatives; refer to the following figure illustrating the transformation of the CC conditions of losses into loss-derivatives.

![CC](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/statmlben/ensLoss/main/fig/ensLoss_CC.png)

Hence, it allows us to bypass the generation of loss and directly generate the loss-derivatives in SGD, thereby inspires *doubly stochastic gradients* (i.e., random batch samples and random calibrated loss-derivatives) of our Algorithm.

## Overview of the Experiments

Different **loss functions** can be integrated with **various neural networks** and **regularization methods** to tackle the classification problem across **diverse datasets**. In order to compare the advantages of our proposed method, we have provided reproducible benchmark code and results in this repository.

This repository supports:

- **Data Modes**
  - [x] Image data ([main_img.py](./main_image.py))
  - [x] Tabular data ([main_tab.py](./main_tab.py))
  - [ ] Text data ([main_text.py](./main_text.py))

- **Loss** ([losses.py](./losses.py))
  - [x] `ensLoss` (our method)
  - [x] `BCELoss`: binary cross entropy
  - [x] `Hinge`: hinge loss
  - [x] `EXP`: exponential loss
  - [x] `BinFocal`: binary focal loss

- **Model** ([img_models](./img_models/) + [tab_models](./tab_models/) + [text_models](./text_models/))
  - [x] VGG: `VGG16`, `VGG19`
  - [x] ResNet: `ResNet18`, `ResNet34`, `ResNet50`, `ResNet101`, `ResNet152`
  - [x] MobileNet: `MobileNet`, `MobileNetV2`
  - [x] DenseNet: `DenseNet121`, `DenseNet161`, `DenseNet169`, `DenseNet201`
  - [x] TabMLP\{D\} with different depths `D=1,3,5`
  - [x] LSTM: `LSTM`, `BiLSTM`

- **Regularization methods**
  - [x] `dropout` in [ResNet](./img_models/resnet.py)
  - [x] `weight_decay`
  - [x] `data augumentation` in [CIFAR](./loader.py)

Our running results are publicly available in both our W&B projects and this GitHub repository.
- **W&B projects**
  - [x] [ensLoss-tab](https://wandb.ai/bdai/ensLoss-tab?nw=nwuserbdai)
  - [x] [ensLoss-img](https://wandb.ai/bdai/ensLoss-img?nw=nwuserbdai)
  - [x] [ensLoss-txt](https://wandb.ai/bdai/ensLoss-txt?nw=nwuserbdai)
- **Markdown reports**
  - [x] [out_tab](./out/out_tab.md)
  - [x] [out_cifar](./out/out_cifar.md)
  - [x] [out_pcam](./out/out_pcam.md)
  - [x] [out_text](./out/out_text.md)
  - [x] [out_reg](./out/out_reg.md)

## Benchmarks for Image Data

This benchmark contains two image datasets: [CIFAR10](https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~kriz/cifar.html) and [PCam](https://github.com/basveeling/pcam).

- **CIFAR.** The CIFAR10 dataset was originally designed for multiclass image classification. In our study, we construct (10 x 9) / 2 = 45 binary CIFAR datasets, denoted as CIFAR2, by selecting all possible pairs of two classes from the CIFAR10 dataset, which enables the evaluation of our method.
- **PCam.** The PCam dataset is an image binary classification dataset consisting of 327,680 96x96 color images derived from histopathologic scans of lymph node sections, with each image annotated with a binary label indicating the presence or absence of metastatic tissue.

### Replicating Benchmark
The summary statistics of datasets exhibiting statistical significance when comparing the proposed **ensLoss** against all other fixed loss methods in **45 CIFAR2** binary classification datasets are presented.

| **Models**       | **EnsLoss** | **(vs BCE)**                  | **(vs Exp)**                  | **(vs Hinge)**                |
|------------------|-------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| **ResNet34**     |             | (41 better, 4 no diff, 0 worse) | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) | (36 better, 9 no diff, 0 worse) |
| **ResNet50**     |             | (42 better, 3 no diff, 0 worse) | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) | (43 better, 2 no diff, 0 worse) |
| **ResNet101**    |             | (39 better, 6 no diff, 0 worse) | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) | (40 better, 5 no diff, 0 worse) |
| **VGG16**        |             | (36 better, 9 no diff, 0 worse) | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) | (29 better, 16 no diff, 0 worse) |
| **VGG19**        |             | (36 better, 9 no diff, 0 worse) | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) | (27 better, 18 no diff, 0 worse) |
| **MobileNet**    |             | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) | (44 better, 1 no diff, 0 worse) |
| **MobileNetV2**  |             | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) | (45 better, 0 no diff, 0 worse) |

To replicate the benchmark results presented in our paper, please use the following command:
```bash
bash ./sh_files/runs_cifar_mobilenet.sh
bash ./sh_files/runs_cifar_resnet.sh
bash ./sh_files/runs_cifar_vgg.sh
bash ./sh_files/runs_pcam.sh
```
Our runing results are publicly avaliable in our W\&B project [ensLoss-img](https://wandb.ai/bdai/ensLoss-img?nw=nwuserbdai) and the markdown report [out_cifar](./out/out_cifar.md) and [out_pcam](./out/out_pcam.md).

### Customize the Run
To execute the methods on a dataset, use the following command:
```bash
## run for CIFAR
python main_image.py -F="CIFAR35"
## run for PCam
python main_image.py -F="PCam"
```
> Note that `CIFAR{u}{v}` represents the pairwise CIFAR dataset containing labels {u} and {v}.

The runing configuration is included in `main_img.py`, with the default settings as follows:
```python
config = {
        'loss_list': ['ensLoss', 'Focal', 'BCE', 'Hinge', 'EXP'],
        'dataset' : 'CIFAR',
        'model': {'net': 'ResNet50'},
        'save_model': False,
        'batch_size': 128,
        'ensLoss_per_epochs': -1,
        'trainer': {'epochs': 200, 'val_per_epochs': 5},
        'optimizer': {'lr': 1e-3, 'type': 'SGD', 'weight_decay': 5e-4, 'lr_scheduler': 'CosineAnnealingLR', 'args': {'T_max': 200}},
        'device': torch.device("cuda:0" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")}
```
To customize your experiment, please adjust the parameters in `argument` and `config`.

> Note that the results regarding the compatibility of existing overfitting prevention methods in our paper can also be replicated with customized runs, see [main_reg.py](./main_reg.py).

## Benchmarks for Tabular Data

This benchmark contain 14 tabular datasets in [openml](https://www.openml.org/). These datasets were selected based on the following filtering criteria: `verified`, `>1000 instances`, `>1000 features`, `binary class`, `dense`, and with at least one official run. The resulting datasets can be found [here](https://www.openml.org/search?type=data&sort=runs&status=active&qualities.NumberOfInstances=between_1000_10000&qualities.NumberOfFeatures=between_1000_10000&qualities.NumberOfClasses=%3D_2&format=ARFF):

| **Dataset**       | **Data ID** | **(n,d) (× 10³)** |
|-------------------|-------------|-------------------|
| Bioresponse       | 4134        | (3.75, 1.78)      |
| guillermo         | 41159       | (20.0, 4.30)      |
| riccardo          | 41161       | (20.0, 4.30)      |
| hiva-agnostic     | 1039        | (4.23, 1.62)      |
| christine         | 41142       | (5.42, 1.64)      |
| OVA-Breast        | 1128        | (1.54, 10.9)      |
| OVA-Uterus        | 1138        | (1.54, 10.9)      |
| OVA-Ovary         | 1166        | (1.54, 10.9)      |
| OVA-Kidney        | 1134        | (1.54, 10.9)      |
| OVA-Lung          | 1130        | (1.54, 10.9)      |
| OVA-Omentum       | 1139        | (1.54, 10.9)      |
| OVA-Colon         | 1161        | (1.54, 10.9)      |
| OVA-Endometrium   | 1142        | (1.54, 10.9)      |
| OVA-Prostate      | 1146        | (1.54, 10.9)      |

### Replicating Benchmark
The summary statistics of datasets exhibiting statistical significance when comparing the proposed **ensLoss** against all other fixed loss methods in **14 OpenML** binary classification datasets are presented.

| **Models** | **EnsLoss** | **(vs BCE)**         | **(vs Exp)**         | **(vs Hinge)**       |
|------------|-------------|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|
| **MLP(1)** |             | (9 better, 4 no diff, 1 worse) | (7 better, 5 no diff, 2 worse) | (5 better, 4 no diff, 5 worse) |
| **MLP(3)** |             | (7 better, 7 no diff, 0 worse) | (8 better, 5 no diff, 1 worse) | (9 better, 3 no diff, 2 worse) |
| **MLP(5)** |             | (11 better, 3 no diff, 0 worse) | (11 better, 2 no diff, 1 worse) | (13 better, 0 no diff, 1 worse) |

To replicate the benchmark results presented in our paper, please use the following command:
```bash
bash ./sh_files/runs_tab.sh
```
Our runing results are publicly avaliable in our W\&B project [ensLoss-tab](https://wandb.ai/bdai/ensLoss-tab?nw=nwuserbdai) and the markdown report [out_tab](./out/out_tab.md).

### Customize the Run
To execute the methods on a dataset, use the following command:
```bash
python main_tab.py -ID=4134
```
Note that the `ID` refers to the dataset ID in OpenML. The runing configuration is included in `main_tab.py`, with the default settings as follows:

```python
config = {
        'dataset' : 4134,
        'model': {'net': 'TabMLP3', 'args': {}},
        'batch_size': 128,
        'save_model': False,
        'ensLoss_per_epochs': -1,
        'trainer': {'epochs': 300, 'val_per_epochs': 10},
        'optimizer': {'lr': 1e-4, 'type': 'SGD', 'weight_decay': 5e-6,
                        'lr_scheduler': 'CosineAnnealingLR', 'args': {'T_max': 300}},
        'device': torch.device("cuda:0" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")}
```
To customize your experiment, please adjust the parameters in `argument` and `config`.

## Benchmarks for Text Data
This benchmark contains one text datasets: [GLUE-SST2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/nyu-mll/glue).

> Currently, the majority of NLP learning employs fine-tuning (often just a few epochs) from large pretrained models. Consequently, `ensLoss` that require extensive epoch training, are not particularly suitable. Therefore, we did not focus on NLP results in this paper; however, we conducted some preliminary experiments.

To execute the methods on a dataset, use the following command:
```bash
python main_text.py -F="SST2"
```

The runing configuration is included in `main_text.py`, with the default settings as follows:
```python
config = {
        'dataset' : args.filename,
        'model': {'net': 'BiLSTM'},
        'save_model': False,
        'batch_size': 32,
        'ensLoss_per_epochs': -1,
        'trainer': {'epochs': 50, 'val_per_epochs': 5},
        'optimizer': {'lr': 2e-5, 'type': 'AdamW', 'weight_decay': 1e-5,
                        'lr_scheduler': 'CosineAnnealingLR', 'args': {'T_max': args.epoch}},
        'device': torch.device("cuda:0" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")}
```
To customize your experiment, please adjust the parameters in `argument` and `config`.

## References
- [OpenML](https://www.openml.org/)
- [Pytorch.data](https://pytorch.org/tutorials/beginner/basics/data_tutorial.html)
- [Train CIFAR10 with PyTorch](https://github.com/kuangliu/pytorch-cifar)
- [huggingface.transformers](https://huggingface.co/transformers/v3.3.1/index.html)
- [GLUE benchmark](https://gluebenchmark.com/leaderboard)
- [PS3E24: PyTorch Tabular Resnet](https://www.kaggle.com/code/syerramilli/ps3e24-pytorch-tabular-resnet)

## Thank you

If you find this repository helpful, please star our repo 🌟.

Thank you so much for the support from our stargazers.

[![Stargazers repo roster for @statmlben/ensLoss](https://reporoster.com/stars/statmlben/ensLoss)](https://github.com/statmlben/ensLoss/stargazers)

ensLoss

ensLoss Latest Version Download

Today's picks

Was this content helpful?

Recent Feedback

ensLoss

ensLoss Latest Version Download

Today's picks

Was this content helpful?

Recent Feedback

Download README