KO
|
EN
gitlite — search
Search
#javascript
#php
#ruby
#java
#python
#hacktoberfest
#nodejs
#c-sharp
#csharp
#objective-c
#community
#shell
yolov8_animeface
★ 74
Open GitHub ↗
Anime Face Detection using YOLOv8
Download README (.md)
Explore Similar Repositories
llm-testing-findings
:
LLM Testing Findings Templates
clash-dashboard
:
clash-dashboard 最新备份，原仓库删库前一天克隆的，包含绝大部分提交记录。
proxy-list
:
🚀 Free HTTP / SOCKS4 / SOCKS5 proxy list. DAILY UPDATE! ⏰
polymer-template
:
No description available.
UCD-SCM
:
[IGARSS 2024] Segment Change Model (SCM) for Unsupervised Change detection in VHR Remote Sensing Images: a Case Study of Buildings
// repository documentation
Was this content helpful?
★ 0
(0 ratings)
Select Rating:
★
★
★
★
★
Submit Feedback
Recent Feedback
×
Download README
Do you want to download the
README.md
file for
yolov8_animeface
?
Download (.md)
# yolov8_animeface Anime Face Detection using YOLOv8 ## Dataset Dataset was made created with 10 000 images manually annotated from safebooru. Split was train 70, val 20, test 10. ## Usage One model is provided in the release page. Requirements are provided in the requirements.txt file. All notebooks are provided to train, evaluate, and predict with the model. They're shipped with comments and notes to understand yolov8's results. To use the model, simply use ```python from ultralytics import YOLO yolov8_animeface = YOLO('yolov8_animeface.pt') yolov8_animeface.predict('./images/', save=True, conf=0.3, iou=0.5) ``` Tweak conf and iou as you want. ## Performance This model is based on yolov8x6. It has been trained on the said dataset for 300 epoch at 1280px*1280px. It took ~110 hours to train on a RTX A4000. On my dataset, the model performs particularly well with the default parameters. ``` Images Instances Box(P R mAP50 mAP50-95): 1002 1562 0.957 0.924 0.955 0.534 Speed: 1.3ms preprocess, 81.9ms inference, 0.0ms loss, 0.8ms postprocess per image ``` While it doesn't provide a huge mAP50-95, its predictions are always correct on the files I've tested. Confidence could be higher, but the model is very precise.  *Confusion matrix of the model, generated on the test set*  *PR curve of the model, generated on the test set* Other metrics are available in the `./demo/val` subfolder. ## Demo Manual annotation | yolov8_animeface :-------------------------:|:-------------------------:  |   |  ## Comparison with an existing model While we can argue about the comparison between two models from different generations, I believe it is interesting to compare this model with [zymk9's model](https://github.com/zymk9/yolov5_anime), based on yolov5. They both have the same purpose and were trained in the same fashion. On the same dataset with the same parameters (conf=0.001 & iou=0.6), yolov8x6-animeface produces better metrics than the one on yolov5x. yolov8-animeface: ``` Images Instances Box(P R mAP50 mAP50-95): 1002 1562 0.956 0.919 0.953 0.532 Speed: 1.2ms preprocess, 81.2ms inference, 0.0ms loss, 1.0ms postprocess per image ``` yolov5-anime: ``` Images Instances Box(P R mAP50 mAP50-95): 1003 1566 0.778 0.685 0.633 0.232 Speed: 1.5ms pre-process, 85.5ms inference, 1.4ms NMS per image at shape (32, 3, 1280, 1280) ``` yolov5-anime provides better results when images are resized at 640px, but it still is inferior to yolov8-animeface with the same parameters. Surprisingly enough, yolov5 is way more confident that yolov8. However, it also has way more false positives. Yolov8_animeface | Yolov5_anime :-------------------------:|:-------------------------:  |   |  ## Conclusion While this model performs greatly on my dataset, my metrics can differ from yours. One lighter model might be released on a later occasion. Based on YOLOv8 by Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., & Qiu, J. (2023). Ultralytics YOLO (Version 8.0.0) [Computer software]. https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
